Becoming a Part of the National Park SystemRuth Heikkinen |
||
|
|
Every year, the National Park Service is asked by Congress to study, on average, four or five resources and provide advice as to whether or not they should be added to the National Park System. In December 2000, Congress directed NPS to study the Lincoln Highway and develop a plan for its preservation. In response, the NPS Midwest Regional Office assembled an interdisciplinary team from across the country and began a Special Resource Study (SRS). If you have ever thought that your favorite cultural resource would make a great national historic site, then this article is for you. As directed by Congress, an SRS assesses whether or not a resource would make an appropriate addition to the National Park System. This process involves four steps:
Determining National Significance
While it was relatively easy to evaluate the Lincoln Highway against the first and third of these criteria--the highway is an outstanding example of early transcontinental named highways and it does offer superlative opportunities for public enjoyment--evaluating the Lincoln Highway against the second and fourth criteria was more challenging. Deciding whether or not the resource "possesses exceptional value or quality in illustrating or interpreting the natural or cultural themes of our nation's heritage"--is much more straightforward when we are asked to study resources that are already NHLs (see sidebar). This was not the case for the Lincoln Highway. The study team, assisted by Kevin Patrick of Indiana University of Pennsylvania, who worked with us under the Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement with the NPS, had to devote time to evaluating the highway against the NHL criteria. In the end, we concluded that the Lincoln Highway's significance is best reflected in its association with events (NHL criterion 1) and the way in which it is composed of integral parts that are exceptional as a collective whole (NHL criterion 5). Findings of integrity are difficult with resources as large in scale and as diverse as a historic highway. For this reason, the study team also struggled with the fourth SRS criterion--resources need to retain a high degree of integrity to be recommended for inclusion in the National Park System. We solicited the opinions of experts in highway history, geography, and roadside landscapes and conducted a coast-to-coast study of the highway. Aided with this information, the study team concluded, unfortunately, that large stretches of the roadway's corridor retained only one or two features to remind today’s travelers of its history. As a result, we decided that, in its entirety, the Lincoln Highway does not retain a high degree of integrity as a true, accurate, and relatively unspoiled example of a resource. Suitability, Feasibility, and the Need for NPS Management Of course, there are many ways to preserve and interpret historic resources other than inclusion in the National Park System. Rather than ending with the finding that the Lincoln Highway was not an appropriate addition to the National Park System, the study team went on to analyze other management alternatives. Ultimately, when costs, benefits, and environmental impacts of five different alternatives were considered, the alternative plan that the team selected involved either establishing a new nonprofit organization or enhancing the capabilities of an existing organization to commemorate, preserve and interpret the Lincoln Highway. Such an organization would undertake activities like comprehensive planning, uniform signage, and developing a system of certified interpretive sites. The NPS would provide financial and technical support to this organization. Just as NPS only embarks on SRSs when directed by Congress, Congress would need to enact legislation to authorize NPS to implement the preferred management alternative.
Public Involvement and Reaction The alternative plan for the National Lincoln Highway Program (either establish a new nonprofit or enhance the capabilities of an existing organization to commemorate, preserve, and interpret the Lincoln Highway) is widely supported by the public. Supportive comments noted that, while sending a signal the highway and its resources are significant and merit some level of protection, the alternative plan allows decisions regarding preservation of specific resources to be made locally. Concerns about the study reflected two opposite themes. While several state and local transportation departments expressed concern about the difficulty in balancing historic road preservation with the need to maintain safety and efficiency standards early in the study process, they did not express these concerns with the selected alternative. In contrast, there is some disappointment among resource advocates that the alternative plan does not go far enough in mandating preservation. For more information about the study, visit <http://www.nps.gov/mwro/lincolnhighway>. Evaluating Resources as National Historic Landmarks (NHLs)
Sidebar 2 Background on the Lincoln Highway Ruth Heikkinen is a planner in the Midwest Regional Office of the National Park Service.
|
|