Capitol CommentaryBruce Craig, Director of the National
|
||
|
Bush Administration to Prosecute Journalists The government asserts in the brief that lobbyists "have no First Amendment right to willfully disclose national defense information." But the government went on to say "we recognize that a prosecution under the espionage laws of an actual member of the press for publishing classified information leaked to it by a government source would raise legitimate and serious issues and would not be undertaken lightly, indeed, the fact that there has never been such a prosecution speaks for itself." We now know where lobbyists and journalists stand in the eyes of government prosecutors, but exactly what the status of historians and scholars is remains unclear. Coalition Calls For NARA Oversight Hearing Both before and following the confirmation of Archivist of the United States Allen Weinstein last year, the coalition advanced to Collins's committee a request that a general oversight hearing be conducted. With the exception of Weinstein's hour-long confirmation hearing, it has now been over a decade since the Senate paid any attention to the operating programs under NARA's administration and jurisdiction. During his confirmation hearing, Weinstein welcomed the opportunity for the Senate to scrutinize NARA's program and, according to inside NARA sources, his attitude has not changed since then. The letter points out a number of issues that make a Senate hearing at this time especially timely. Added to the list of concerns mentioned in earlier requestsi.e. concern over stolen documents, and improperly handled documents by high government officials (most recently National Security Advisor Sandy Berger)the letter notes the need for Senate investigation into the alarming "secret" reclassification program that the Archivist recently ordered a moratorium on pending completion of an ISOO audit. The letter also points out the need for a progress report and a discussion of the long terms needs of the Electronic Records Archives project; discussion of administrative aspects of the presidential library system (including the recent agreement between NARA and the Nixon Library foundation); the need for scrutiny over the implementation of the Presidential Records Act; as well as the need to consider a proposal for a higher authorization for the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC). All these, the letter states, are deserving of the Senate's "scrutiny and serious consideration." NCH staff anticipate meeting with Senate staff on the letter in the near future. House Approves Clinton Birthplace Home as a National Park Unit National Park Service (NPS) insiders report that there was no contextual study to assess and compare the "suitability, feasibility, and historical significance" of this site with others associated with President Clinton. The NPS was not requested by the committee to comment on the proposal. NPS policy discourages designations of birthplaces as NPS units and instead favors designations of other sites more closely associated with a president's historical significance. Congressional supporters of the Clinton site maintain that "While there are numerous residences associated with Clinton, this property is the one most closely identified with his youth and early development." The designation also has the support of President Clinton. NARA Releases State NARA reports that access to these newly released electronic records is enhanced by the recent redesign of the National Archives Access to Archival Databases (AAD) system, a research tool that makes a selection of the Archives' most popular electronic records available to the public over the Internet. AAD currently includes over 86 million electronic records from 48 series in some 29 record groups and three collections of donated historical materials. These long awaited digital records are publicly accessible at the National Archives website at <http//www.archives.gov/aad>. |
|